Re: [PATCH 0/2] Move away from non-failing small allocations

[Sasha Levin]

On 03/11/2015 04:54 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> The second patch is the first step in the transition plan. It changes
> the default but it is NOT an upstream material. It is aimed for brave
> testers who can cope with failures. I have talked to Andrew and he
> was willing to keep that patch in mmotm tree. It would be even better
> to have this in linux-next because the testing coverage would be even
> bigger. Dave Chinner has also shown an interest to integrate this into
> his xfstest farm. It would be great if Fenguang could add it into the
> zero testing project too (if the pushing the patch into linux-next
> would be too controversial).

Stuff in mmotm automatically end up in linux-next.


Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/