Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] cpufreq: mediatek: add Mediatek cpufreq driver

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 05:16:42PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:

> I think until the time we revive the voltage-domain stuff we need to support
> mediatek's driver. And probably a virtual regulator is the best approach
> unless someone else comes up with another idea.

Why not just write a custom cpufreq driver if it's too hard to abstract?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature