Re: [PATCH 3/4] staging: sm750fb: correctly define SM750LE_REVISION_ID

[Giedrius StatkeviÄius]

On 2015.03.08 14:31, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> check if it is already defined before defining SM750LE_REVISION_ID
> again and at the same time mention correct data type.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.h | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.h b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.h
> index 1c78875..e7d27e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.h
> @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
>  #ifndef DDK750_CHIP_H__
>  #define DDK750_CHIP_H__
>  #define DEFAULT_INPUT_CLOCK 14318181 /* Default reference clock */
> -#define SM750LE_REVISION_ID (char)0xfe
> +#ifndef SM750LE_REVISION_ID
> +#define SM750LE_REVISION_ID ((unsigned char)0xfe)
> +#endif

Do you need these parantheses? Also, you can now then fix up this line
too to avoid a redundant cast in the same patch:
sm750_hw.c: if(share->revid == (unsigned char)SM750LE_REVISION_ID){


-- 
Thanks,
Giedrius
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/