Re: Using regmap_update_bits to update a write only register

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 08:14:14PM +0200, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> On Mar 5, 2015 7:54 PM, "Mark Brown" <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Probably, or there's a bug.  What should happen is that if the register
> > default appeared successfully then the read will get statisfied from the
> > cache in the manner you describe - presumably that's gone wrong somehow.
> > Have you set num_reg_defaults?  That's the obvious thing...

> Did that. I will have a closer look. Thanks for the answer.

OK, the other thing that springs to mind to check is that the register
didn't somehow get marked as volatile.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature