Re: [PATCH v2] sched, timer: Use atomics for thread_group_cputimer to improve scalability

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Mon Mar 02 2015 - 16:44:13 EST


On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Jason Low <jason.low2@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In original code, we set cputimer->running first so it is running while
> we call update_gt_cputime(). Now in this patch, we swapped the 2 calls
> such that we set running after calling update_gt_cputime(), so that
> wouldn't be an issue anymore.

Hmm. If you actually care about ordering, and 'running' should be
written to after the other things, then it might be best if you use

smp_store_release(&cputimer->running, 1);

which makes it clear that the store happens *after* what went before it.

Or at least have a "smp_wmb()" between the atomic64 updates and the
"WRITE_ONCE()".

I guess that since you use cmpxchg in update_gt_cputime, the accesses
end up being ordered anyway, but it might be better to make that thing
very explicit.

Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/