Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: dw_mmc: Don't start commands while busy

From: addy ke
Date: Fri Feb 20 2015 - 22:34:34 EST


Hi, Doug

I have two cards which are easy to get "Timeout sending command":
one is ADATA uhs-1 SDR50, another is Kingston uhs-1 SDR104.
After merge three patches:
--
* mmc: dw_mmc: Don't start commands while busy
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5858221/

* mmc: dw_mmc: Make sure we only adjust the clock when power is on
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5858261/

* mmc: dw_mmc: Give a good reset after we give power
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5858281/
-
Both of them can pass bind/unbind test, thank you.

test script:
cd /sys/bus/platform/drivers/dwmmc_rockchip
for i in $(seq 1 5000); do
echo "========================" $i
echo ff0c0000.dwmmc > unbind
sleep .5
echo ff0c0000.dwmmc > bind
sleep 2
done


On 2015/2/21 04:31, Doug Anderson wrote:
> We've seen problems on some WiFi modules where we seem to send a CMD53
> (which requires the data lines) while the module is asserting busy.
> We shouldn't do that.
>
> The Designware Databook says that before issuing a new data transfer
> command we should check for busy, so that's what we'll do.
>
> We'll leverage the existing dw_mmc knowledge about whether it should
> wait for the previous command to finish to know whether we should
> check for busy before sending the command. This means we won't end up
> incorrectly waiting for things like CMD52 (SDIO) or CMD13 (SD) which
> don't use the data line.
>
> Note that this also has the advantage of making sure that we don't
> change the clock while the card is busy, too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Also check for busy in in mci_send_cmd()
>
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index 4d2e3c2..7733c5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ struct idmac_desc {
>
> static bool dw_mci_reset(struct dw_mci *host);
> static bool dw_mci_ctrl_reset(struct dw_mci *host, u32 reset);
> +static int dw_mci_card_busy(struct mmc_host *mmc);
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
> static int dw_mci_req_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> @@ -335,6 +336,31 @@ static u32 dw_mci_prep_stop_abort(struct dw_mci *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
> return cmdr;
> }
>
> +static void dw_mci_wait_while_busy(struct dw_mci *host, u32 cmd_flags)
> +{
> + unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(500);
> +
> + /*
> + * Databook says that before issuing a new data transfer command
> + * we need to check to see if the card is busy. Data transfer commands
> + * all have SDMMC_CMD_PRV_DAT_WAIT set, so we'll key off that.
> + *
> + * ...also allow sending for SDMMC_CMD_VOLT_SWITCH where busy is
> + * expected.
> + */
> + if ((cmd_flags & SDMMC_CMD_PRV_DAT_WAIT) &&
> + !(cmd_flags & SDMMC_CMD_VOLT_SWITCH)) {
> + while (mci_readl(host, STATUS) & SDMMC_STATUS_BUSY) {
> + if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
> + /* Command will fail; we'll pass error then */
> + dev_err(host->dev, "Busy; trying anyway\n");
> + break;
> + }
> + udelay(10);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void dw_mci_start_command(struct dw_mci *host,
> struct mmc_command *cmd, u32 cmd_flags)
> {
> @@ -345,6 +371,7 @@ static void dw_mci_start_command(struct dw_mci *host,
>
> mci_writel(host, CMDARG, cmd->arg);
> wmb();
> + dw_mci_wait_while_busy(host, cmd_flags);
>
> mci_writel(host, CMD, cmd_flags | SDMMC_CMD_START);
> }
> @@ -876,6 +903,7 @@ static void mci_send_cmd(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 cmd, u32 arg)
>
> mci_writel(host, CMDARG, arg);
> wmb();
> + dw_mci_wait_while_busy(host, cmd);
> mci_writel(host, CMD, SDMMC_CMD_START | cmd);
>
> while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/