Re: [PATCH] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions

[Raghavendra K T]

On 02/11/2015 11:08 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 02/11, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> > On 02/10/2015 06:56 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > > In this case __ticket_check_and_clear_slowpath() really needs to cmpxchg
> > > the whole .head_tail. Plus obviously more boring changes. This needs a
> > > separate patch even _if_ this can work.
> >
> > Correct, but apart from this, before doing xadd in unlock,
> > we would have to make sure lsb bit is cleared so that we can live with 1
> > bit overflow to tail which is unused. now either or both of head,tail
> > lsb bit may be set after unlock.
>
> Sorry, can't understand... could you spell?
>
> If TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG lives in .head arch_spin_unlock() could simply do
>
> 	head = xadd(&lock->tickets.head, TICKET_LOCK_INC);
>
> 	if (head & TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG)
> 		__ticket_unlock_kick(head);
>
> so it can't overflow to .tail?

You are right.
I totally forgot we can get rid of tail operations :)

> And we we do this, probably it makes sense to add something like
>
> 	bool tickets_equal(__ticket_t one, __ticket_t two)
> 	{
> 		return (one ^ two) & ~TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG;
> 	}

Very nice idea. I was tired of ~TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG usage all over in
the current (complex :)) implementation. These two suggestions helps
alot.

> and change kvm_lock_spinning() to use tickets_equal(tickets.head, want), plus
> it can have more users in asm/spinlock.h.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/