[PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 003/135] clocksource: exynos_mct: Fix bitmask regression for exynos4_mct_write

From: Luis Henriques
Date: Fri Feb 06 2015 - 07:41:47 EST


3.16.7-ckt6 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 8c38d28ba8da98f7102c31d35359b4dbe9d1f329 upstream.

EXYNOS4_MCT_L_MASK is defined as 0xffffff00, so applying this bitmask
produces a number outside the range 0x00 to 0xff, which always results
in execution of the default switch statement.

Obviously this is wrong and git history shows that the bitmask inversion
was incorrectly set during a refactoring of the MCT code.

Fix this by putting the inversion at the correct position again.

Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: GP Orcullo <kinsamanka@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
index ab51bf20a3ed..336a60fbabf9 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
@@ -97,8 +97,8 @@ static void exynos4_mct_write(unsigned int value, unsigned long offset)
__raw_writel(value, reg_base + offset);

if (likely(offset >= EXYNOS4_MCT_L_BASE(0))) {
- stat_addr = (offset & ~EXYNOS4_MCT_L_MASK) + MCT_L_WSTAT_OFFSET;
- switch (offset & EXYNOS4_MCT_L_MASK) {
+ stat_addr = (offset & EXYNOS4_MCT_L_MASK) + MCT_L_WSTAT_OFFSET;
+ switch (offset & ~EXYNOS4_MCT_L_MASK) {
case MCT_L_TCON_OFFSET:
mask = 1 << 3; /* L_TCON write status */
break;
--
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/