Re: [PATCH v8 02/21] acpi: fix acpi_os_ioremap for arm64

From: Hanjun Guo
Date: Tue Feb 03 2015 - 04:09:01 EST


On 2015å02æ03æ 06:14, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, February 02, 2015 08:45:30 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
From: Mark Salter <msalter@xxxxxxxxxx>

The acpi_os_ioremap() function may be used to map normal RAM or IO
regions. The current implementation simply uses ioremap_cache(). This
will work for some architectures, but arm64 ioremap_cache() cannot be
used to map IO regions which don't support caching. So for arm64, use
ioremap() for non-RAM regions.

CC: Rafael J Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/acpi/acpi_io.h | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_io.h b/include/acpi/acpi_io.h
index 444671e..9d573db 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_io.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_io.h
@@ -1,11 +1,17 @@
#ifndef _ACPI_IO_H_
#define _ACPI_IO_H_

+#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/io.h>

static inline void __iomem *acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys,
acpi_size size)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
+ if (!page_is_ram(phys >> PAGE_SHIFT))
+ return ioremap(phys, size);
+#endif

I don't want to see #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64 in this file.

There are multiple examples of how things like this are done. Generally,
the logic is "If the architecture provides its own function for this, use
that one, or use the generic one provided here otherwise."

OK. I think weak function would work.

Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/