Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] of: fix size when dma-range is not used

From: Murali Karicheri
Date: Mon Feb 02 2015 - 11:11:20 EST


On 02/02/2015 07:18 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:06:27PM +0000, Murali Karicheri wrote:
On 01/28/2015 12:30 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
I think we can remove this check altogether (we leaved without it for a
while) but we need to add 1 when calculating the mask:

dev->coherent_dma_mask = min(DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
DMA_BIT_MASK(ilog2(size + 1)));

For Keystone, the dma_addr is to be taken care as well to determine the
mask. The above will not work.

This was discussed before (not on this thread) and dma_addr should not
affect the mask, it only affects the pfn offset.

Based on the discussion so far, this is the function I have come up with
incorporating the suggestions. Please review this and see if I have
missed out any. This works fine on Keystone.

void of_dma_configure(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np)
{
u64 dma_addr = 0, paddr, size;
int ret;
bool coherent;
unsigned long offset = 0;
struct iommu_ops *iommu;

/*
* Set default size to cover the 32-bit. Drivers are expected to setup
* the correct size and dma_mask.
*/
size = 1ULL<< 32;

ret = of_dma_get_range(np,&dma_addr,&paddr,&size);
if (!ret) {
offset = PFN_DOWN(paddr - dma_addr);
if (!size) {
dev_err(dev, "Invalid size (%llx)\n",
size);
return;
}
if (size& 1) {
size = size + 1;
dev_warn(dev, "Incorrect usage of size (%llx)\n",
size);
}
dev_dbg(dev, "dma_pfn_offset(%#08lx)\n", offset);
}
dev->dma_pfn_offset = offset;

/*
* Coherent DMA masks larger than 32-bit must be explicitly set by the
* driver.
*/
dev->coherent_dma_mask = min(DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
DMA_BIT_MASK(ilog2(dma_addr + size)));

That's not correct, coherent_dma_mask should still be calculated solely
based on size, not dma_addr.

Functions like swiotlb_dma_supported() use phys_to_dma() which on ARM
(32-bit) subtracts the dma_pfn_offset, so the mask based on size works
fine.

In the arm64 tree, we haven't taken dma_pfn_offset into account for
phys_to_dma() yet but if needed for a SoC, we'll add it.

I need to hear Arnd's comment on this. I am seeing an issue without this change. Probably it needs a change else where. I will post the error I am getting to this list.

Murali

--
Murali Karicheri
Linux Kernel, Texas Instruments
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/