[PATCH v2 1/3] time: Don't bother to run rtc_resume() for the nonstop clocksource

From: Xunlei Pang
Date: Thu Jan 22 2015 - 07:02:32 EST


If a system does not provide a persistent_clock(), the time
will be updated on resume by rtc_resume(). With the addition
of the non-stop clocksources for suspend timing, those systems
set the time on resume in timekeeping_resume(), but may not
provide a valid persistent_clock().

This results in the rtc_resume() logic thinking no one has set
the time and it then will over-write the suspend time again,
which is not necessary and only increases clock error.

So, fix this for rtc_resume().

Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v1->v2:
Modify according to Thomas' feedback.

drivers/rtc/class.c | 2 +-
include/linux/timekeeping.h | 7 +++++++
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 16 +++++-----------
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/class.c b/drivers/rtc/class.c
index 472a5ad..6100af5 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/class.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/class.c
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
struct timespec64 sleep_time;
int err;

- if (has_persistent_clock())
+ if (timekeeping_sleeptime_injected())
return 0;

rtc_hctosys_ret = -ENODEV;
diff --git a/include/linux/timekeeping.h b/include/linux/timekeeping.h
index 9b63d13..2b87c64 100644
--- a/include/linux/timekeeping.h
+++ b/include/linux/timekeeping.h
@@ -238,6 +238,13 @@ extern void getnstime_raw_and_real(struct timespec *ts_raw,
*/
extern bool persistent_clock_exist;
extern int persistent_clock_is_local;
+extern bool timekeeping_sleeptime_inject;
+
+/* Used by rtc_resume() */
+static inline bool timekeeping_sleeptime_injected(void)
+{
+ return timekeeping_sleeptime_inject;
+}

static inline bool has_persistent_clock(void)
{
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 6a93185..732ccd0 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ int __read_mostly timekeeping_suspended;

/* Flag for if there is a persistent clock on this platform */
bool __read_mostly persistent_clock_exist = false;
+bool timekeeping_sleeptime_inject;

static inline void tk_normalize_xtime(struct timekeeper *tk)
{
@@ -1140,13 +1141,6 @@ void timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64(struct timespec64 *delta)
struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.timekeeper;
unsigned long flags;

- /*
- * Make sure we don't set the clock twice, as timekeeping_resume()
- * already did it
- */
- if (has_persistent_clock())
- return;
-
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
write_seqcount_begin(&tk_core.seq);

@@ -1178,8 +1172,8 @@ static void timekeeping_resume(void)
struct timespec64 ts_new, ts_delta;
struct timespec tmp;
cycle_t cycle_now, cycle_delta;
- bool suspendtime_found = false;

+ timekeeping_sleeptime_inject = false;
read_persistent_clock(&tmp);
ts_new = timespec_to_timespec64(tmp);

@@ -1226,13 +1220,13 @@ static void timekeeping_resume(void)
nsec += ((u64) cycle_delta * mult) >> shift;

ts_delta = ns_to_timespec64(nsec);
- suspendtime_found = true;
+ timekeeping_sleeptime_inject = true;
} else if (timespec64_compare(&ts_new, &timekeeping_suspend_time) > 0) {
ts_delta = timespec64_sub(ts_new, timekeeping_suspend_time);
- suspendtime_found = true;
+ timekeeping_sleeptime_inject = true;
}

- if (suspendtime_found)
+ if (timekeeping_sleeptime_inject)
__timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(tk, &ts_delta);

/* Re-base the last cycle value */
--
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/