Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:38:17AM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 07:17:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> > 
> > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig)
> > failed like this:
> > 
> > In file included from arch/sparc/include/asm/bug.h:20:0,
> >                  from include/linux/bug.h:4,
> >                  from include/linux/thread_info.h:11,
> >                  from include/asm-generic/preempt.h:4,
> >                  from arch/sparc/include/generated/asm/preempt.h:1,
> >                  from include/linux/preempt.h:18,
> >                  from include/linux/spinlock.h:50,
> >                  from include/linux/mmzone.h:7,
> >                  from include/linux/gfp.h:5,
> >                  from include/linux/slab.h:14,
> >                  from mm/mmap.c:12:
> > mm/mmap.c: In function 'exit_mmap':
> > mm/mmap.c:2858:46: error: 'PUD_SHIFT' undeclared (first use in this function)
> >     round_up(FIRST_USER_ADDRESS, PUD_SIZE) >> PUD_SHIFT);
> >                                               ^
> > include/asm-generic/bug.h:86:25: note: in definition of macro 'WARN_ON'
> >   int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition);    \
> >                          ^
> > mm/mmap.c:2858:46: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> >     round_up(FIRST_USER_ADDRESS, PUD_SIZE) >> PUD_SHIFT);
> >                                               ^
> > include/asm-generic/bug.h:86:25: note: in definition of macro 'WARN_ON'
> >   int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition);    \
> >                          ^
> > 
> > Caused by commit b316feb3c37f ("mm: account pmd page tables to the
> > process").  32 bit sparc does not seem to define PUD_SHIFT ...
> > 
> > I am not sure what the correct fix is here, so I just did the following
> > patch for today.
> > 
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:10:53 +1100
> > Subject: [PATCH] mm: account pmd page tables to the process fix
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  mm/mmap.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> > index 6a7d36d133fb..25271805ab39 100644
> > --- a/mm/mmap.c
> > +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> > @@ -2854,8 +2854,10 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
> >  
> >  	WARN_ON(atomic_long_read(&mm->nr_ptes) >
> >  			round_up(FIRST_USER_ADDRESS, PMD_SIZE) >> PMD_SHIFT);
> > +#ifdef PUD_SHIFT
> >  	WARN_ON(mm_nr_pmds(mm) >
> >  			round_up(FIRST_USER_ADDRESS, PUD_SIZE) >> PUD_SHIFT);
> > +#endif
> >  }
> >  
> >  /* Insert vm structure into process list sorted by address
> 
> Looks like it should be #ifdef CONFIG_MMU, Kirill?

No. The problem is that <asm-generic/4level-fixup.h> doesn't define
PUD_SHIFT. The fix is proposed:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg83249.html

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/