[PATCH v3] Staging: vt6656: Checkpatch fix: else after break or return

[Emrys Bayliss]

This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl error:
rxtx.c:558: WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return

Signed-off-by: Emrys Bayliss <emrys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
The else statement was replaced with a block to avoid the following
compiler error:
"warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code"
due to this declaration:
struct vnt_cts *buf = &head->cts_g; (line 559)

Is there a better way such as using head (a union) directly instead?

The last patch I sent removed the return 0. Since this isn't related to
the error in the title I left it for a separate patch.

 drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
index ea5140a..831a051 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
@@ -555,7 +555,9 @@ static u16 vnt_fill_cts_head(struct vnt_usb_send_context *tx_context,
 		memcpy(buf->data.ra, priv->current_net_addr, ETH_ALEN);
 
 		return vnt_rxtx_datahead_g_fb(tx_context, &buf->data_head);
-	} else {
+	}
+
+	{
 		struct vnt_cts *buf = &head->cts_g;
 		/* Get SignalField,ServiceField,Length */
 		vnt_get_phy_field(priv, cts_frame_len,
-- 
2.2.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/