Re: [PATCH RESEND] dma-mapping: tidy up dma_parms default handling

From: Marek Szyprowski
Date: Tue Jan 13 2015 - 06:19:20 EST


Hello,

On 2015-01-09 17:56, Robin Murphy wrote:
Many DMA controllers and other devices set max_segment_size to
indicate their scatter-gather capability, but have no interest in
segment_boundary_mask. However, the existence of a dma_parms structure
precludes the use of any default value, leaving them as zeros (assuming
a properly kzalloc'ed structure). If a well-behaved IOMMU (or SWIOTLB)
then tries to respect this by ensuring a mapped segment does not cross
a zero-byte boundary, hilarity ensues.

Since zero is a nonsensical value for either parameter, treat it as an
indicator for "default", as might be expected. In the process, clean up
a bit by replacing the bare constants with slightly more meaningful
macros and removing the superfluous "else" statements.

Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>

---

Hi, various maintainers from Git logs ;)

This one's a bit tricky to find a home for - I think technically it's
probably an IOMMU patch, but then the long-underlying problem doesn't
seem to have blown up anything until arm64, and my motivation is to
make bits of Juno work, which seems to nudge it towards arm64/arm-soc
territory. Could anyone suggest which tree is most appropriate?

Thanks,
Robin.

include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 17 ++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
index c3007cb..99ba736 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
@@ -141,7 +141,9 @@ static inline void arch_teardown_dma_ops(struct device *dev) { }
static inline unsigned int dma_get_max_seg_size(struct device *dev)
{
- return dev->dma_parms ? dev->dma_parms->max_segment_size : 65536;
+ if (dev->dma_parms && dev->dma_parms->max_segment_size)
+ return dev->dma_parms->max_segment_size;
+ return SZ_64K;
}
static inline unsigned int dma_set_max_seg_size(struct device *dev,
@@ -150,14 +152,15 @@ static inline unsigned int dma_set_max_seg_size(struct device *dev,
if (dev->dma_parms) {
dev->dma_parms->max_segment_size = size;
return 0;
- } else
- return -EIO;
+ }
+ return -EIO;
}
static inline unsigned long dma_get_seg_boundary(struct device *dev)
{
- return dev->dma_parms ?
- dev->dma_parms->segment_boundary_mask : 0xffffffff;
+ if (dev->dma_parms && dev->dma_parms->segment_boundary_mask)
+ return dev->dma_parms->segment_boundary_mask;
+ return DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
}
static inline int dma_set_seg_boundary(struct device *dev, unsigned long mask)
@@ -165,8 +168,8 @@ static inline int dma_set_seg_boundary(struct device *dev, unsigned long mask)
if (dev->dma_parms) {
dev->dma_parms->segment_boundary_mask = mask;
return 0;
- } else
- return -EIO;
+ }
+ return -EIO;
}
#ifndef dma_max_pfn

Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/