Re: [PATCH 4/4] clk: tegra: Add support for the Tegra132 CAR IP block

From: Stephen Warren
Date: Fri Jan 09 2015 - 16:00:44 EST


On 01/09/2015 01:52 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hi Thierry

On Fri, 9 Jan 2015, Thierry Reding wrote:

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:38:29PM -0800, Paul Walmsley wrote:

This patch is based on several patches from others:

1. a patch from Peter De Schrijver:

http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1407.1/06094.html

2. a patch from Bill Huang ("clk: tegra: enable cclk_g at boot on
Tegra132"), and

3. a patch from Allen Martin ("clk: Enable tegra clock driver for
tegra132").

Doesn't this technically require Signed-off-bys from each of the above,
then?

I don't think so. Documentation/SubmittingPatches states:

It's certainly been deemed acceptable in the past, if admittedly not optimal, for the person who is the "exit point" of an organization/company for the patch to be the only person to sign it off. The reason being they're vouching that the Certificate of Origin applies to all the company-sponsored work internal to the organization.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/