Re: livepatching tree for linux-next

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 00:01:02 +0100 (CET) Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 7 Jan 2015, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > > OK, I have added this from today
> > 
> > My x86_64 allmodconfig broke.
> > 
> > In file included from include/linux/livepatch.h:29,
> >                  from kernel/livepatch/core.c:30:
> > ./arch/x86/include/asm/livepatch.h:29:2: error: #error Your compiler must support -mfentry for live patching to work
> 
> [ adding Steven and Masami to CC, as this in some sense is related in 
>   both to ftrace regs caller, and to IPMODIFY users in general ]
> 
> Well, if your gcc is too old (which is a fact detemined during build time, 
> so there is no way to express this in Kconfig language in form of 
> dependencies), we have to introduce build-time failure, as there is no way 
> for this to work on compilers that don't support fentry on x86_64.
> 
> The only remaining option is to let the code build, pretend that 
> everything is working, but do something like
> 
> #ifndef CC_USING_FENTRY
> 	printk("The compiler you used to compile your kernel was ancient "
> 		"there is no way for you to make use of this feature\n");
> 	return -EINVAL;
> #endif
> 
> or so ... which I personally detest even more.

um, what's so special about this patchset that it gets to be the first
code in the history of the kernel which breaks allmodconfig?

Please find a way to fix it.  Copying CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR is one way.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/