[PATCH 3.17 23/73] dm cache: fix spurious cell_defer when dealing with partial block at end of device

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Tue Jan 06 2015 - 21:34:59 EST


3.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Joe Thornber <ejt@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit f824a2af3dfbbb766c02e19df21f985bceadf0ee upstream.

We never bother caching a partial block that is at the back end of the
origin device. No cell ever gets locked, but the calling code was
assuming it was and trying to release it.

Now the code only releases if the cell has been set to a non NULL
value.

Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
@@ -2554,11 +2554,11 @@ static int __cache_map(struct cache *cac
static int cache_map(struct dm_target *ti, struct bio *bio)
{
int r;
- struct dm_bio_prison_cell *cell;
+ struct dm_bio_prison_cell *cell = NULL;
struct cache *cache = ti->private;

r = __cache_map(cache, bio, &cell);
- if (r == DM_MAPIO_REMAPPED) {
+ if (r == DM_MAPIO_REMAPPED && cell) {
inc_ds(cache, bio, cell);
cell_defer(cache, cell, false);
}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/