Re: [PATCH] irqchip: omap-intc: fix legacy DMA regression

From: Tony Lindgren
Date: Tue Jan 06 2015 - 13:34:28 EST


* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [150106 10:08]:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 10:51:33AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * FIXME legacy OMAP DMA driver sitting under arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c
> > + * depends is still not ready for linear IRQ domains; because of that
> > + * we need to temporarily "blacklist" OMAP2 and OMAP3 devices from using
> > + * linear IRQ Domain until that driver is finally fixed.
>
> "finally fixed" or finally killed off like it really needs to be, once
> all users of it are killed.
>
> We've been trying to do this for, what, three years now... I finally
> pushed a WARN_ON() into that code to make it obvious to anyone who
> uses omap_request_dma() that they really need to update their code.
>
> Here's the list of references to that symbol which *still* need to be
> fixed so that we can kill the legacy DMA driver:
>
> drivers/media/platform/omap/omap_vout_vrfb.c: ret = omap_request_dma(vout->vrfb_dma_tx.dev_id, "VRFB DMA TX",
> drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isphist.c: ret = omap_request_dma(OMAP24XX_DMA_NO_DEVICE, "DMA_ISP_HIST",
> drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/omap1_camera.c: err = omap_request_dma(OMAP_DMA_CAMERA_IF_RX, DRIVER_NAME,
> drivers/mtd/onenand/omap2.c: r = omap_request_dma(0, pdev->dev.driver->name,

AFAIK we should just remove DMA support from the drivers above.
Nobody seems to be interested in doing anything about them.

> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/omap_udc.c: status = omap_request_dma(dma_channel,
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/omap_udc.c: status = omap_request_dma(dma_channel,

OK so Aaro picked this one.

> drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c: ret = omap_request_dma(chdat->sync_dev, dev_name,
> drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c: ret = omap_request_dma(tusb_dma->sync_dev, "TUSB shared",

I'll update this one. FYI, I already have some work-in-progress
MUSB DMA patches that allow building in all the MUSB DMA glue
layers. I just need to finish that series for v3.20:

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap.git/log/?h=musb-dma-2014-11-25-v2

So converting tusb6010 over to the dmaengine API would be the
next logical step after that series. Probably not going to
happen before v3.21 though..

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/