Re: [PATCH V3 11/11] power: charger-manager: Support to change polling rate in runtime.

From: jonghwa3 . lee
Date: Sun Dec 21 2014 - 20:57:25 EST


On 2014ë 12ì 20ì 09:29, Pavel Machek wrote:

>
>> Add 'polling_ms' sysfs node to change charger-manager's monitoring rate
>> in runtime. It can set only bigger than 2 jiffies (for 200 HZ system it
>> is 10 msecs.) as it's allowed for minimum poling rate in previous.
>
> New sysfs filesneed documentation.
>
>> It resets poller and re-configure polling rate based on new input if next
>
> re-configures...", if"
>
>> polling time is far enough. Otherwise, it just waits expiration of timer
>
> "waits for"
>
>> and new polling rate will affects the next scheduling.
>
> "affect"?
>


Sorry for so many typos.. including above typos I'll revise all of them.

>
>> +static ssize_t show_polling_ms(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct charger_manager *cm;
>> + ssize_t len;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(cm, &cm_list, entry)
>> + if (cm->charger_psy.dev == dev)
>> + break;
>> +
>> + if (cm->charger_psy.dev != dev)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> Any chance to reorganize data structures so that this kind of list
> walking is not neccessary?
>


No need to reorganize, I'll fix it to get target data without unnecessary
iteration.

>> +static ssize_t store_polling_ms(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf,
>> + size_t count)
>> +{
>> + struct charger_manager *cm;
>> + int polling_ms;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = sscanf(buf, "%d", &polling_ms);
>
> "kstrtoul"?
>


Yes, it would be better. I'll modify it either.

Thanks for reviewing.
Jonghwa

> Pavel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/