[PATCH 3/7] f2fs: don't need to call lock_op and lock_page for abort

From: Jaegeuk Kim
Date: Mon Dec 15 2014 - 02:28:29 EST


We don't need to call lock_op and lock_page at the aborting path.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 11e4b5c..3ce86c5 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -240,33 +240,38 @@ void commit_inmem_pages(struct inode *inode, bool abort)
* Otherwise, f2fs_gc in f2fs_balance_fs can wait forever until this
* inode becomes free by iget_locked in f2fs_iget.
*/
- if (!abort)
+ if (!abort) {
f2fs_balance_fs(sbi);
-
- f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
+ f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
+ }

mutex_lock(&fi->inmem_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(cur, tmp, &fi->inmem_pages, list) {
- lock_page(cur->page);
- if (!abort && cur->page->mapping == inode->i_mapping) {
- f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback(cur->page, DATA);
- if (clear_page_dirty_for_io(cur->page))
- inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
- do_write_data_page(cur->page, &fio);
- submit_bio = true;
+ if (!abort) {
+ lock_page(cur->page);
+ if (cur->page->mapping == inode->i_mapping) {
+ f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback(cur->page, DATA);
+ if (clear_page_dirty_for_io(cur->page))
+ inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
+ do_write_data_page(cur->page, &fio);
+ submit_bio = true;
+ }
+ f2fs_put_page(cur->page, 1);
+ } else {
+ put_page(cur->page);
}
radix_tree_delete(&fi->inmem_root, cur->page->index);
- f2fs_put_page(cur->page, 1);
list_del(&cur->list);
kmem_cache_free(inmem_entry_slab, cur);
dec_page_count(F2FS_I_SB(inode), F2FS_INMEM_PAGES);
}
- if (submit_bio)
- f2fs_submit_merged_bio(sbi, DATA, WRITE);
mutex_unlock(&fi->inmem_lock);

- filemap_fdatawait_range(inode->i_mapping, 0, LLONG_MAX);
- f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
+ if (!abort) {
+ f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
+ if (submit_bio)
+ f2fs_submit_merged_bio(sbi, DATA, WRITE);
+ }
}

/*
--
2.1.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/