Re: [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: retry on NUMA_NO_NODE when create_worker() fails

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:05 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 5:19 AM, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> A pwq bound to a specified node might be last long or even forever after
>> the node was offline.  Especially when this pwq has some back-to-back work
>> items which requeue themselves and cause the pwq can't quit.
>>
>> This kinds of pwqs will cause their own pools busy and maybe create workers.
>> This pools will fail on create_worker() since the node is offline.
>>
>> This case is extremely rare, but it is possible. And we hope create_worker()
>> to be fault-tolerant in this case and other different cases when the node
>> is lack of memory, for example, create_worker() can try to allocate memory
>> from the whole system rather than only the target node, the most important
>> thing is making some progress.
>>
>> So the solution is that, when the create_worker() fails on a specified node,
>> it will retry with NUMA_NO_NODE for further allocation.
>
> The code looks correct. But I don't think this issue depend on node offlining.
> The allocation may also fail if node has no memory.

Oh, sorry. my comment is no correct. Please forget.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/