Re: [PATCH 3.2 042/164] vfs: fix data corruption when blocksize < pagesize for mmaped data

From: Jan Kara
Date: Fri Dec 12 2014 - 03:48:24 EST


On Fri 12-12-14 06:14:25, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 3.2.65-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ------------------
>
> From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
>
> commit 90a8020278c1598fafd071736a0846b38510309c upstream.
This patch needs also commit f55fefd1a5a339b1bd08c120b93312d6eb64a9fb,
otherwise XFS will spew lots of false warnings...

Honza
>
> ->page_mkwrite() is used by filesystems to allocate blocks under a page
> which is becoming writeably mmapped in some process' address space. This
> allows a filesystem to return a page fault if there is not enough space
> available, user exceeds quota or similar problem happens, rather than
> silently discarding data later when writepage is called.
>
> However VFS fails to call ->page_mkwrite() in all the cases where
> filesystems need it when blocksize < pagesize. For example when
> blocksize = 1024, pagesize = 4096 the following is problematic:
> ftruncate(fd, 0);
> pwrite(fd, buf, 1024, 0);
> map = mmap(NULL, 1024, PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
> map[0] = 'a'; ----> page_mkwrite() for index 0 is called
> ftruncate(fd, 10000); /* or even pwrite(fd, buf, 1, 10000) */
> mremap(map, 1024, 10000, 0);
> map[4095] = 'a'; ----> no page_mkwrite() called
>
> At the moment ->page_mkwrite() is called, filesystem can allocate only
> one block for the page because i_size == 1024. Otherwise it would create
> blocks beyond i_size which is generally undesirable. But later at
> ->writepage() time, we also need to store data at offset 4095 but we
> don't have block allocated for it.
>
> This patch introduces a helper function filesystems can use to have
> ->page_mkwrite() called at all the necessary moments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
> [bwh: Backported to 3.2:
> - Adjust context
> - truncate_setsize() already has an oldsize variable]
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/buffer.c | 3 +++
> include/linux/mm.h | 1 +
> mm/truncate.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -2019,6 +2019,7 @@ int generic_write_end(struct file *file,
> struct page *page, void *fsdata)
> {
> struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
> + loff_t old_size = inode->i_size;
> int i_size_changed = 0;
>
> copied = block_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied, page, fsdata);
> @@ -2038,6 +2039,8 @@ int generic_write_end(struct file *file,
> unlock_page(page);
> page_cache_release(page);
>
> + if (old_size < pos)
> + pagecache_isize_extended(inode, old_size, pos);
> /*
> * Don't mark the inode dirty under page lock. First, it unnecessarily
> * makes the holding time of page lock longer. Second, it forces lock
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -952,6 +952,7 @@ static inline void unmap_shared_mapping_
>
> extern void truncate_pagecache(struct inode *inode, loff_t old, loff_t new);
> extern void truncate_setsize(struct inode *inode, loff_t newsize);
> +void pagecache_isize_extended(struct inode *inode, loff_t from, loff_t to);
> extern int vmtruncate(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset);
> extern int vmtruncate_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t end);
>
> --- a/mm/truncate.c
> +++ b/mm/truncate.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/buffer_head.h> /* grr. try_to_release_page,
> do_invalidatepage */
> #include <linux/cleancache.h>
> +#include <linux/rmap.h>
> #include "internal.h"
>
>
> @@ -575,12 +576,65 @@ void truncate_setsize(struct inode *inod
>
> oldsize = inode->i_size;
> i_size_write(inode, newsize);
> -
> + if (newsize > oldsize)
> + pagecache_isize_extended(inode, oldsize, newsize);
> truncate_pagecache(inode, oldsize, newsize);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(truncate_setsize);
>
> /**
> + * pagecache_isize_extended - update pagecache after extension of i_size
> + * @inode: inode for which i_size was extended
> + * @from: original inode size
> + * @to: new inode size
> + *
> + * Handle extension of inode size either caused by extending truncate or by
> + * write starting after current i_size. We mark the page straddling current
> + * i_size RO so that page_mkwrite() is called on the nearest write access to
> + * the page. This way filesystem can be sure that page_mkwrite() is called on
> + * the page before user writes to the page via mmap after the i_size has been
> + * changed.
> + *
> + * The function must be called after i_size is updated so that page fault
> + * coming after we unlock the page will already see the new i_size.
> + * The function must be called while we still hold i_mutex - this not only
> + * makes sure i_size is stable but also that userspace cannot observe new
> + * i_size value before we are prepared to store mmap writes at new inode size.
> + */
> +void pagecache_isize_extended(struct inode *inode, loff_t from, loff_t to)
> +{
> + int bsize = 1 << inode->i_blkbits;
> + loff_t rounded_from;
> + struct page *page;
> + pgoff_t index;
> +
> + WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&inode->i_mutex));
> + WARN_ON(to > inode->i_size);
> +
> + if (from >= to || bsize == PAGE_CACHE_SIZE)
> + return;
> + /* Page straddling @from will not have any hole block created? */
> + rounded_from = round_up(from, bsize);
> + if (to <= rounded_from || !(rounded_from & (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1)))
> + return;
> +
> + index = from >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> + page = find_lock_page(inode->i_mapping, index);
> + /* Page not cached? Nothing to do */
> + if (!page)
> + return;
> + /*
> + * See clear_page_dirty_for_io() for details why set_page_dirty()
> + * is needed.
> + */
> + if (page_mkclean(page))
> + set_page_dirty(page);
> + unlock_page(page);
> + page_cache_release(page);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pagecache_isize_extended);
> +
> +/**
> * vmtruncate - unmap mappings "freed" by truncate() syscall
> * @inode: inode of the file used
> * @newsize: file offset to start truncating
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/