Re: [PATCH v2] irqchip: mediatek: Use IS_ERR() instead of NULL pointer check

From: Beniamino Galvani
Date: Wed Dec 10 2014 - 15:11:03 EST


On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 07:53:13AM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Beniamino Galvani wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:55:02PM +0800, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> > > Beniamino reported a kernel oops caused by an invalid DT file for the
> > > mediatek interrupt polarity extension.
> > >
> > > The reason is that the interrupt polarity support for mediatek chips
> > > merely checks for NULL pointer instead of a casted error return
> > > value in mtk_sysirq_of_init() so any other casted error value passes
> > > the NULL pointer check and causes a kernel panic when dereferenced.
> > >
> > > Use IS_ERR() and return the error value via PTR_ERR().
> > >
> > > Reported-and-tested-by: Beniamino Galvani <b.galvani@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Well, actually I only reported the bug and didn't do any test. Can the
> > "-and-tested" portion of the tag be dropped while applying the patch?
>
> I'd prefer that it be tested before applying. Would you mind confirming
> that the oops is gone with this patch applied?

Probably the commit message is misleading about this, but I don't own
any Mediatek device and never used the driver. I only reported [1] a
possible bug in the driver found through code analysis.

Anyway, I suppose that the tests done by Yingjoe are enough to get the
patch merged.

Beniamino

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/29/105
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/