Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] gpio/xilinx: Remove offset property

From: Michal Simek
Date: Wed Dec 10 2014 - 09:18:28 EST


On 12/10/2014 02:21 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> Instead of calculating the register offset per call, pre-calculate it on
> probe time.
>
> Acked-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> v2: Add Acked-by
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c | 33 +++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
> index ba18b06..9483950 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ struct xgpio_instance {
> struct of_mm_gpio_chip mmchip;
> u32 gpio_state;
> u32 gpio_dir;
> - u32 offset;

when you remove offset property you should also remove offset from comment
above of this structure.

> spinlock_t gpio_lock;
> };
>
> @@ -65,12 +64,8 @@ struct xgpio_instance {
> static int xgpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio)
> {
> struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc = to_of_mm_gpio_chip(gc);
> - struct xgpio_instance *chip =
> - container_of(mm_gc, struct xgpio_instance, mmchip);
>
> - void __iomem *regs = mm_gc->regs + chip->offset;
> -
> - return !!(xgpio_readreg(regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET) & BIT(gpio));
> + return !!(xgpio_readreg(mm_gc->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET) & BIT(gpio));
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -88,7 +83,6 @@ static void xgpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
> struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc = to_of_mm_gpio_chip(gc);
> struct xgpio_instance *chip =
> container_of(mm_gc, struct xgpio_instance, mmchip);
> - void __iomem *regs = mm_gc->regs;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
>
> @@ -98,8 +92,7 @@ static void xgpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
> else
> chip->gpio_state &= ~BIT(gpio);
>
> - xgpio_writereg(regs + chip->offset + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET,
> - chip->gpio_state);
> + xgpio_writereg(mm_gc->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET, chip->gpio_state);
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
> }
> @@ -119,13 +112,12 @@ static int xgpio_dir_in(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio)
> struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc = to_of_mm_gpio_chip(gc);
> struct xgpio_instance *chip =
> container_of(mm_gc, struct xgpio_instance, mmchip);
> - void __iomem *regs = mm_gc->regs;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
>
> /* Set the GPIO bit in shadow register and set direction as input */
> chip->gpio_dir |= BIT(gpio);
> - xgpio_writereg(regs + chip->offset + XGPIO_TRI_OFFSET, chip->gpio_dir);
> + xgpio_writereg(mm_gc->regs + XGPIO_TRI_OFFSET, chip->gpio_dir);
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
>
> @@ -148,7 +140,6 @@ static int xgpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
> struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc = to_of_mm_gpio_chip(gc);
> struct xgpio_instance *chip =
> container_of(mm_gc, struct xgpio_instance, mmchip);
> - void __iomem *regs = mm_gc->regs;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
>
> @@ -157,12 +148,11 @@ static int xgpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
> chip->gpio_state |= BIT(gpio);
> else
> chip->gpio_state &= ~BIT(gpio);
> - xgpio_writereg(regs + chip->offset + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET,
> - chip->gpio_state);
> + xgpio_writereg(mm_gc->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET, chip->gpio_state);
>
> /* Clear the GPIO bit in shadow register and set direction as output */
> chip->gpio_dir &= ~BIT(gpio);
> - xgpio_writereg(regs + chip->offset + XGPIO_TRI_OFFSET, chip->gpio_dir);
> + xgpio_writereg(mm_gc->regs + XGPIO_TRI_OFFSET, chip->gpio_dir);
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
>
> @@ -178,10 +168,8 @@ static void xgpio_save_regs(struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc)
> struct xgpio_instance *chip =
> container_of(mm_gc, struct xgpio_instance, mmchip);
>
> - xgpio_writereg(mm_gc->regs + chip->offset + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET,
> - chip->gpio_state);
> - xgpio_writereg(mm_gc->regs + chip->offset + XGPIO_TRI_OFFSET,
> - chip->gpio_dir);
> + xgpio_writereg(mm_gc->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET, chip->gpio_state);
> + xgpio_writereg(mm_gc->regs + XGPIO_TRI_OFFSET, chip->gpio_dir);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -247,9 +235,6 @@ static int xgpio_of_probe(struct device_node *np)
> if (!chip)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - /* Add dual channel offset */
> - chip->offset = XGPIO_CHANNEL_OFFSET;
> -
> /* Update GPIO state shadow register with default value */
> of_property_read_u32(np, "xlnx,dout-default-2",
> &chip->gpio_state);
> @@ -285,6 +270,10 @@ static int xgpio_of_probe(struct device_node *np)
> np->full_name, status);
> return status;
> }
> +
> + /* Add dual channel offset */
> + chip->mmchip.regs += XGPIO_CHANNEL_OFFSET;
> +
> pr_info("XGpio: %s: dual channel registered, base is %d\n",
> np->full_name, chip->mmchip.gc.base);
> }
>

Thanks,
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/