Re: [PATCH 3.17 100/141] x86, microcode: Fix accessing dis_ucode_ldr on 32-bit

[boris ostrovsky]

On 11/26/2014 5:55 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:00:45AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > Sigh... I take this back. It breaks 32-bit baremetal. I haven't looked any
> > further but it seems to be dying very early. I suspect cpuid pv_op is not
> > set up yet. If that's true, perhaps you could check whether it is valid in
> > x86_guest()?
> Right, this is why we're using the native variants in the early loader.
> So we need a different method for detecting very early whether we're
> running as a guest.
>
> What I'd like more, though, is if we continue debugging the original
> issue where we fail in load_ucode_intel_ap(). Does it happen on this line:
>
> initrd_start_addr = (unsigned long)__pa_nodebug(*initrd_start_p);

I don't have access to my test setup right now (and won't be until late 
today at best) but I am pretty sure this was the line when I was looking 
at this yesterday.

> where we deref the initrd_start_p? Do you have a full splat with a Code:
> section?

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/25/973 is all I have right now.


-boris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/