Re: [PATCH v5 02/18] ACPI / table: Add new function to get table entries

From: Hanjun Guo
Date: Tue Nov 25 2014 - 20:43:44 EST


On 2014/11/26 5:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 25, 2014 11:38:05 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2014/11/24 22:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Monday, November 24, 2014 07:03:54 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>> On 2014-11-24 9:27, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, October 17, 2014 09:36:58 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>>>> From: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The acpi_table_parse() function has a callback that
>>>>>> passes a pointer to a table_header. Add a new function
>>>>>> which takes this pointer and parses its entries. This
>>>>>> eliminates the need to re-traverse all the tables for
>>>>>> each call. e.g. as in acpi_table_parse_madt() which is
>>>>>> normally called after acpi_table_parse().
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/acpi/tables.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>>>>> include/linux/acpi.h | 4 +++
>>>>>> 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/tables.c b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
>>>>>> index 6d5a6cd..21ae521 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/tables.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
>>>>>> @@ -192,17 +192,14 @@ void acpi_table_print_madt_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> int __init
>>>>>> -acpi_table_parse_entries(char *id,
>>>>>> - unsigned long table_size,
>>>>>> - int entry_id,
>>>>>> - acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
>>>>>> - unsigned int max_entries)
>>>>>> +acpi_parse_entries(unsigned long table_size,
>>>>>> + acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
>>>>>> + struct acpi_table_header *table_header,
>>>>>> + int entry_id, unsigned int max_entries)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> - struct acpi_table_header *table_header = NULL;
>>>>>> struct acpi_subtable_header *entry;
>>>>>> - unsigned int count = 0;
>>>>>> + int count = 0;
>>>>>> unsigned long table_end;
>>>>>> - acpi_size tbl_size;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (acpi_disabled)
>>>>>> return -ENODEV;
>>>>>> @@ -210,13 +207,11 @@ acpi_table_parse_entries(char *id,
>>>>>> if (!handler)
>>>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - if (strncmp(id, ACPI_SIG_MADT, 4) == 0)
>>>>>> - acpi_get_table_with_size(id, acpi_apic_instance, &table_header, &tbl_size);
>>>>>> - else
>>>>>> - acpi_get_table_with_size(id, 0, &table_header, &tbl_size);
>>>>>> + if (!table_size)
>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (!table_header) {
>>>>>> - pr_warn("%4.4s not present\n", id);
>>>>>> + pr_warn("Table header not present\n");
>>>>> The message doesn't make sense any more if the table signature is not printed.
>> For this message, since no table id is passed, and this message is printed in
>> acpi_table_parse_entries() before this function is called, I think we can check
>> the table_header before call this function and remove the printed message here.
> table_header needs to be checked against NULL in the caller and the message
> printed from there to my eyes.

ok, I think table id should pass to this function, I will rework this patch
and resend.

Thanks
Hanjun


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/