Re: thunderbolt: Deletion of unnecessary checks before the function call "ring_free"

From: Joe Perches
Date: Sun Nov 23 2014 - 10:20:32 EST


On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 15:14 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> 2. Are any additional prefixes appropriate so that further name space
> >> conflicts can be better avoided?
> >
> > To avoid possible external naming conflicts, add tb_ prefix to
> > various ring_<foo> structs and functions.
>
> Do you imagine that any XEN software developers need also to reconsider
> this implementation detail?
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c?id=fc14f9c1272f62c3e8d01300f52467c0d9af50f9#n268

I think static functions can be named whatever
the developer chooses.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/