Re: [PATCH v10 05/11] drm: bridge/dw_hdmi:split some phy configuration to platform driver

From: Andy Yan
Date: Fri Nov 14 2014 - 06:08:56 EST



On 2014å11æ14æ 18:55, Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel wrote:

On 14/11/14 10:53, Andy Yan wrote:
Hi ZubairLK:
Thanks for your review.
On 2014å11æ14æ 18:19, Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel wrote:
Hi Andy,

Nice work on this patch series. Its getting better and better :).

On 14/11/14 03:27, Andy Yan wrote:
hdmi phy clock symbol and transmission termination value
can adjust platform specific to get the best SI
^Is this signal integrity?
yes , SI is signal integrity, such as eye diagram measurement
Are these two disjoint features in separate patches?

also add mode_valid interface for some platform may not support
all the display mode
Sounds like another separate patch to me. :)
they can seperate
Also, This series is becoming quite large. With major changes and fixes mixed together.

Patch 3 splits imx-drm.
Patch 4 moves dw-drm out of imx-drm folder.
Patch 7 adds binding
Patch 9 converts to drm bridge.

Can these be placed together easily?
And in the start. i.e. patch 1, 2, 3, 4,

Then all fixes etc can come afterwards?

It helps when checking histories later as to how a driver was made and how fixes happened.

Especially when file moves happen..
Do you mean we can rearrange the patch series?
put patch 3, 4 ,7, 9 together one bye one
than followed by the fixes patches 5 ,6, 8, 11 ?
Yes. Rearrange so that the split imx-drm/imx-hdmi and conversion to drm-bridge is at the start of the series.
Then the rest are bug fixes and feature additions.
Can I put patch#1(make checkpatch happy) and patch#2 (defer probe) as the first two patch.
Daniel from Google chromium think it's better to put the two slightly changes in the front for easy review.
Cheers,
ZubairLK

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/