Re: [PATCH] arm64: kernel: Copy register_persistent_clock() to arm64 source subtree

From: Anatol Pomozov
Date: Fri Nov 07 2014 - 11:24:25 EST


Hi

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 04:16:03AM +0000, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 11/06/2014 05:25 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
>> > +Stephen
>> >
>> > This patch is for tegra20_timer that uses register_persistent_clock().
>> > I did not find any way to share the same arch code for arm/arm64.
>> >
>> > Actually this register_persistent_clock() does not look arm specific
>> > at all. Would it be better to move it somewhere outside of arch/?
>>
>> No CC to linux-tegra@ or the other Tegra maintainers?
>>
>> Yes, I think it'd be best not to have arch-specific APIs, or cut/paste
>> the same code into multiple places.
>
> Agreed. This looks in no way architecture specific, and having this in
> common code would be preferable to copying.

Where the code common for arm and arm64 should go?
drivers/???/arm_timekeeping.c ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/