Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/2] Fix procfs PCI resources mmap

From: Lorenzo Pieralisi
Date: Tue Nov 04 2014 - 09:15:38 EST


On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 05:28:04PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> The way PCI memory resources are exported to user space through procfs
> is not uniform across architectures. In particular, some architectures
> (ie SPARC) export the resource PCI bus address to user space, whereas
> others (ARM, PowerPC, Microblaze) export the resource CPU physical address.
> This convention should be followed when it comes to passing the pgoff
> values to the mmap syscall to map the resource in question.
>
> Consequently, the checks applied to the offset passed to the mmap syscall
> (in pci_mmap_fits()) are to be interpreted differently on different
> architectures, and in particular they should match the values exported to
> user space through the pci_resource_to_user() conversion function.
>
> This patch series addresses two issues. First patch applies the
> pci_resource_to_user() filter to the PCI resource that is being
> mapped in order to carry out a proper check against the pgoff passed
> from user space. Second patch fixes the way the pgoff is handled in
> the ARM pci_mmap_page_range() implementation.

I appreciate it is hardly number one priority and by no means urgent,
but I would like to get some comments if possible on patch 1 since patch
2, that is a fix for ARM, relies on the approach we go for in order to
fix the pci_mmap_fits() behaviour (patch 1).

Comments welcome.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

>
> v1 posting:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141337461318554&w=2
>
> v1 => v2
> - Reworded commit log as per RMK comments
>
> Lorenzo Pieralisi (2):
> drivers: pci: fix pci_mmap_fits() implementation for procfs mmap
> arm: kernel: fix pci_mmap_page_range() offset calculation
>
> arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c | 10 ++--------
> drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.1.2
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/