Re: [PATCH v4 02/14] regulator: Add function to map modes to struct regulator_desc

From: Javier Martinez Canillas
Date: Tue Nov 04 2014 - 06:02:19 EST


Hello Krzysztof,

Thanks a for your feedback.

On 11/04/2014 11:31 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> + *
>> + * @map_modes: Callback invoked to translate between hardware to standard modes.
>
> Initially I thought it should map from standard to hardware. But then I
> looked at max77802 implementation and it maps from hardware to standard.
> Anyway I got confused (both are "modes" and both unsigned ints).
>
> Could you describe which should be returned?
>

Sure, maybe rewording to:

"Callback invoked to translate from hardware to standard modes." ?

But I'll add also document that the parameter should be a hardware
mode and the return value a standard mode.

>> */
>> struct regulator_desc {
>> const char *name;
>> @@ -285,6 +287,8 @@ struct regulator_desc {
>> unsigned int enable_time;
>>
>> unsigned int off_on_delay;
>> +
>> + unsigned int (*map_modes)(unsigned int mode);
>
> Shouldn't this be in regulator ops?
>

regulator ops are for the operations that a regulator support
(enable, disable, set mode, etc). All the thse are actions but
how to translate between hardware and standard modes is not an
action but a non-varying configuration of the regulator.

So I believe that regulator desc was what fit the most. I don't
have a strong opinion though if people think that it should be
in regulator ops instead.

Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/