Re: [PATCH] kernel, add panic_on_warn

From: Prarit Bhargava
Date: Mon Nov 03 2014 - 08:33:29 EST




On 10/30/2014 09:58 PM, Hedi Berriche wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 17:06 Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> | There have been several times where I have had to rebuild a kernel to
> | cause a panic when hitting a WARN() in the code in order to get a crash
> | dump from a system. Sometimes this is easy to do, other times (such as
> | in the case of a remote admin) it is not trivial to send new images to the
> | user.
> |
> | A much easier method would be a switch to change the WARN() over to a
> | panic. This makes debugging easier in that I can now test the actual
> | image the WARN() was seen on and I do not have to engage in remote
> | debugging.
>
> Do we want to leave it to usersspace[1] to ensure panic_on_warn is out
> of the way in when the kdump kernel boots? or would a self-contained
> approach be more preferable i.e. test whether we're a kdump kernel
> before bothering with panic_on_warn?

Hmm ... this is a good point. Vivek, do you have a preference? I'm willing to
code it either way. I should be able to put in a is_kdump_kernel() check
without any problems but I'm not sure if that is the right thing to do here.

P.

>
> Cheers,
> Hedi.
>
> [1] kexec-tools in the case of the boot param by filtering it out of the
> kdump kernel cmdline. In the case of sysctl.conf, it would depend on
> whether there are distros out there that include it in the kdump
> initrd.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/