Re: [PATCH 1/1] s390/net: Deletion of unnecessary checks before two function calls

From: Ursula Braun
Date: Mon Nov 03 2014 - 06:04:55 EST


I agree with your proposed debug_unregister() changes, but not with your
kfree_fsm() change.

Regards, Ursula Braun

On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 18:40 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> The functions debug_unregister() and kfree_fsm() test whether their argument
> is NULL and then return immediately. Thus the test around the call
> is not needed.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/s390/net/claw.c | 6 ++----
> drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c | 6 ++----
> drivers/s390/net/lcs.c | 6 ++----
> drivers/s390/net/netiucv.c | 12 ++++--------
> 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/claw.c b/drivers/s390/net/claw.c
> index 213e54e..d609ca0 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/net/claw.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/net/claw.c
> @@ -109,10 +109,8 @@ static debug_info_t *claw_dbf_trace;
> static void
> claw_unregister_debug_facility(void)
> {
> - if (claw_dbf_setup)
> - debug_unregister(claw_dbf_setup);
> - if (claw_dbf_trace)
> - debug_unregister(claw_dbf_trace);
> + debug_unregister(claw_dbf_setup);
> + debug_unregister(claw_dbf_trace);
> }
>
> static int
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c b/drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c
> index e056dd4..34dc0f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c
> @@ -1074,8 +1074,7 @@ static void ctcm_free_netdevice(struct net_device *dev)
> if (priv) {
> grp = priv->mpcg;
> if (grp) {
> - if (grp->fsm)
> - kfree_fsm(grp->fsm);
> + kfree_fsm(grp->fsm);
> if (grp->xid_skb)
> dev_kfree_skb(grp->xid_skb);
> if (grp->rcvd_xid_skb)
> @@ -1672,8 +1671,7 @@ static int ctcm_shutdown_device(struct ccwgroup_device *cgdev)
> ctcm_free_netdevice(dev);
> }
>
> - if (priv->fsm)
> - kfree_fsm(priv->fsm);
> + kfree_fsm(priv->fsm);
>
> ccw_device_set_offline(cgdev->cdev[1]);
> ccw_device_set_offline(cgdev->cdev[0]);
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/lcs.c b/drivers/s390/net/lcs.c
> index 0a7d87c..5dfa7dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/net/lcs.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/net/lcs.c
> @@ -88,10 +88,8 @@ static debug_info_t *lcs_dbf_trace;
> static void
> lcs_unregister_debug_facility(void)
> {
> - if (lcs_dbf_setup)
> - debug_unregister(lcs_dbf_setup);
> - if (lcs_dbf_trace)
> - debug_unregister(lcs_dbf_trace);
> + debug_unregister(lcs_dbf_setup);
> + debug_unregister(lcs_dbf_trace);
> }
>
> static int
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/netiucv.c b/drivers/s390/net/netiucv.c
> index 0a87809..bdcc3fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/net/netiucv.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/net/netiucv.c
> @@ -487,12 +487,9 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(char[256], iucv_dbf_txt_buf);
>
> static void iucv_unregister_dbf_views(void)
> {
> - if (iucv_dbf_setup)
> - debug_unregister(iucv_dbf_setup);
> - if (iucv_dbf_data)
> - debug_unregister(iucv_dbf_data);
> - if (iucv_dbf_trace)
> - debug_unregister(iucv_dbf_trace);
> + debug_unregister(iucv_dbf_setup);
> + debug_unregister(iucv_dbf_data);
> + debug_unregister(iucv_dbf_trace);
> }
> static int iucv_register_dbf_views(void)
> {
> @@ -1975,8 +1972,7 @@ static void netiucv_free_netdevice(struct net_device *dev)
> if (privptr) {
> if (privptr->conn)
> netiucv_remove_connection(privptr->conn);
> - if (privptr->fsm)
> - kfree_fsm(privptr->fsm);
> + kfree_fsm(privptr->fsm);
> privptr->conn = NULL; privptr->fsm = NULL;
> /* privptr gets freed by free_netdev() */
> }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/