Re: [PATCH 2/7] wait: Reimplement wait_event_freezable()

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:38:02PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 10/31, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > Provide better implementations of wait_event_freezable() APIs.
> >
> > The problem is with freezer_do_not_count(), it hides the thread from
> > the freezer, even though this thread might not actually freeze/sleep
> > at all.
> 
> I agree, wait_event_freezable() is awful. But could you clarify "at all" ?
> 
> Sure, the task can be preempted right after it sets, it can do a lot
> of things before it calls schedule(), it can be woken after that and
> it can run again and do something else before freezer_count() calls
> try_to_freeze(), etc.
> 
> Is this what you meant?

Yes.

> > +#define __wait_event_freezable(wq, condition)				\
> > +	(void)___wait_event(wq, condition, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 0, 0,	\
> > +			    schedule(); try_to_freeze())
> 
> I don't think this can work.

Yeah, that was horribly broken. defconfig didn't seem to find a usage
site. Wu's robot offered a .config quickly enough though ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/