Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] of: Add binding document for MIPS GIC

[Qais Yousef]

On 10/29/2014 04:56 PM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 10/29/2014 12:12 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> > > +- mti,available-cpu-vectors : Specifies the list of CPU interrupt vectors
> > > +  to which the GIC may route interrupts.  May contain up to 6 entries,
> > > one
> > > +  for each of the CPU's hardware interrupt vectors.  Valid values are 2 -
> > > 7.
> > > +  This property is ignored if the CPU is started in EIC mode.
> > > +
> >
> > Wouldn't it be better to have this in the reversed sense ie:
> > mti,nonavailable-cpu-vectors? I think the assumption that by default they're
> > all available unless something else is connected to them which is unlikely
> > in most cases. It can be made optional property then.
> >
> > I don't have a strong opinion about it though.
> Actually, I think I like the reversed sense as well.  Perhaps
> "mti,reserved-cpu-vectors"?

Yep that's a better wording for sure :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/