Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] cpuidle: idle: menu: Don't reflect when a state selection failed

[Kevin Hilman]

Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 10/28/2014 08:01 AM, Preeti Murthy wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Daniel Lezcano
>> <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> In the current code, the check to reflect or not the outcoming state is done
>>> against the idle state which has been chosen and its value.
>>>
>>> Instead of doing a check in each of the reflect functions, just don't call reflect
>>> if something went wrong in the idle path.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c | 3 +--
>>>   drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c   | 4 +---
>>>   kernel/sched/idle.c                | 3 ++-
>>>   3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
>>> index fb396d6..c0b36a8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
>>> @@ -165,8 +165,7 @@ static int ladder_enable_device(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>>>   static void ladder_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
>>>   {
>>>          struct ladder_device *ldev = &__get_cpu_var(ladder_devices);
>>> -       if (index > 0)
>>> -               ldev->last_state_idx = index;
>>> +       ldev->last_state_idx = index;
>>>   }
>>>
>>>   static struct cpuidle_governor ladder_governor = {
>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
>>> index a17515f..3907301 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
>>> @@ -365,9 +365,7 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>>>   static void menu_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
>>>   {
>>>          struct menu_device *data = &__get_cpu_var(menu_devices);
>>> -       data->last_state_idx = index;
>>> -       if (index >= 0)
>>> -               data->needs_update = 1;
>>> +       data->needs_update = 1;
>>
>> Why is the last_state_idx not getting updated ?
>
> Oups, right. This is missing.
>
> Thanks for pointing this out.
>
> By the way, I don't think a back end driver is changing the selected
> state currently and I am not sure this is desirable since we want to
> trust the state we are going (as a best effort). 

FYI, the OMAP3 backend driver can does not always obey the selected
state, and will return a different state than the one requested.

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/