Re: [PATCH 7/7] docg3: Fix miuse of seq_printf return value

From: Joe Perches
Date: Tue Oct 28 2014 - 13:38:12 EST


On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 13:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:27:40 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 12:05 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > I would like to get this done before I do my merge of trace_seq and
> > > seq_file, but I'm thinking I may have to do that in parallel.
> >
> > I think the most important thing is to get the
> > seq_is_overflown (or seq_has_overflowed or whatever
> > other name is chosen) function added then the rest
> > of the patches can be applied whenever maintainers
> > (or Andrew or trivial or ...) pick them up.
>
> I can get that in without much of an issue. But the merge of trace_seq
> and seq_file would be easier if I didn't have to worry about return
> values. Which is why I want to get this in quickly.

What is the issue there?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/