Re: [RFC 0/4] [RFC] slub: Fastpath optimization (especially for RT)

[Joonsoo Kim]

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:02:18AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> 
> > In this case, object from cpu1's cpu_cache should be
> > different with cpu0's, so allocation would be failed.
> 
> That is true for most object pointers unless the value is NULL. Which it
> can be. But if this is the only case then the second patch + your approach
> would work too.

Indeed... I missed the null value case.
Your second patch + mine would fix that situation, but, I need more
thinking. :)

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/