Re: kernel BUG at fs/sysfs/group.c:65!

From: Weng Meiling
Date: Thu Oct 09 2014 - 08:48:25 EST


On 2014/10/9 20:43, Weng Meiling wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I see the mails you discussed the BUG at fs/sysfs/group.c:65! triggered by duplicated sysfs link.
>
> the detail mail:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/8/370
>
> but it seems the problems has no conclusion. In our environment, we triggered the bug too, but for error ENOENT:
>
> we use 3.4 kernel, and do virtual disk device create / remove for many times. Before remove we can see the devices:
>
> #ll /sys/devices/virtual/block/
> drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 0 Oct 6 09:17 sd-1a
> drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 0 Oct 6 09:17 sd-2a
>
> when the two virtual devices were removed, the directory block/ was delete too.
>
> after many times create / remove, the kernel trigger the bug (just the main call trace):
>
> [ 3965.441713] WARNING: at /usr/src/packages/BUILD/linux-3.4/lib/kobject.c:202 kobject_add_internal+0x11f/0x280()
> [ 3965.441716] Hardware name: Romley
> [ 3965.441718] kobject_add_internal failed for sd-1a (error: -2 parent: block)
>
> [ 3965.441817] Call Trace:
> [ 3965.441820] [<ffffffff8103717a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xb0
> [ 3965.441823] [<ffffffff81037251>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x41/0x50
> [ 3965.441826] [<ffffffff81215e0f>] kobject_add_internal+0x11f/0x280
> [ 3965.441830] [<ffffffff81216267>] kobject_add+0x67/0xc0
> [ 3965.441833] [<ffffffff812d2305>] device_add+0x105/0x6d0
> [ 3965.441836] [<ffffffff812d0dbc>] ? dev_set_name+0x3c/0x40
> [ 3965.441839] [<ffffffff812030ac>] add_disk+0x1bc/0x490
>
> [ 3965.441912] kernel BUG at /usr/src/packages/BUILD/linux-3.4/fs/sysfs/group.c:65!
> [ 3965.441915] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> [ 3965.686738] Call Trace:
> [ 3965.686743] [<ffffffff811a677e>] sysfs_create_group+0xe/0x10
> [ 3965.686748] [<ffffffff810cfb04>] blk_trace_init_sysfs+0x14/0x20
> [ 3965.686753] [<ffffffff811fcabb>] blk_register_queue+0x3b/0x120
> [ 3965.686756] [<ffffffff812030bc>] add_disk+0x1cc/0x490
>
> from the error "kobject_add_internal failed for sd-1a (error: -2 parent: block)", we found that the first
> warning was caused by the disk device's parent_sd was null when it was added into sysfs:
>
> int sysfs_create_dir(struct kobject * kobj)
> {
> ...
> if (kobj->parent)
> parent_sd = kobj->parent->sd;
> else
> parent_sd = &sysfs_root;
>
> if (!parent_sd)
> return -ENOENT;
> ...
> }
>
> The virtual disk device was not added into sysfs because of the above failure, and the kobj->sd was
> not set, then trigger the bug when creating attribute group under the device's directory:
>
> static int internal_create_group(struct kobject *kobj, int update,
> const struct attribute_group *grp)
> {
> ...
> BUG_ON(!kobj || (!update && !kobj->sd));
> ...
> }
>
> Walk the code, it seems there maybe a race between block/ remove and virtual disk devices' register:
>
> when the two virtual devices were removed, the block/ directory's refcount became 0, will into:
>
> path0(remove the block/) path1(register virtual device sd-1a)
>
> kobject_del(){ get_device_parent(){
> ... ...
> sysfs_remove_dir(kobj); //kobj->sd=0 spin_lock(&dev->class->p->glue_dirs.list_lock);

this should be kobj->sd = NULL
> ... <========= list_for_each_entry(k, &dev->class->p->glue_dirs.list, entry) //get parent kobject from kset list
> kobj_kset_leave(kobj); //remove kobj from kset list ...
> } }
>
> If getting parent object between " kobj->sd=0 " and "remove_kset_leave(kobj)", the sysfs_create_dir() will return ENOENT and trigger the BUG later.
>
this should be kobj->sd = NULL

> The lastest kernel seems to be the same. But I am not familiar with block device, I am not sure whether the analysis is right or I am missing something.
> what do you think about this situation? Any suggestion is appreciative. Thanks!
>
>



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/