Re: [PATCH 04/16] virtio-pci: move freeze/restore to virtio core

From: Cornelia Huck
Date: Mon Oct 06 2014 - 06:54:49 EST


On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 19:07:02 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This is in preparation to extending config changed event handling
> in core.
> Wrapping these in an API also seems to make for a cleaner code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/virtio.h | 6 +++++
> drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 55 ++-------------------------------------------
> 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio.h b/include/linux/virtio.h
> index 3c19bd3..8df7ba8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/virtio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/virtio.h
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ bool virtqueue_is_broken(struct virtqueue *vq);
> /**
> * virtio_device - representation of a device using virtio
> * @index: unique position on the virtio bus
> + * @failed: saved value for CONFIG_S_FAILED bit (for restore)
> * @dev: underlying device.
> * @id: the device type identification (used to match it with a driver).
> * @config: the configuration ops for this device.

The only minor gripe I have is with the naming of this field: To a
cursory reader, it might indicate the current 'failed' status of the
device. What about 'saved_failed'?

Otherwise, moving this into common virtio code makes sense.

Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/