Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] ARM: EXYNOS: Add support for non-secure L2X0 resume

From: Tomasz Figa
Date: Mon Sep 15 2014 - 17:31:26 EST


On 15.09.2014 11:03, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
>> index 554b350..71bcfbd 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
>> @@ -102,7 +102,9 @@ static int exynos_suspend(void)
>> writel(EXYNOS_SLEEP_MAGIC, sysram_ns_base_addr + EXYNOS_BOOT_FLAG);
>> writel(virt_to_phys(exynos_cpu_resume_ns),
>> sysram_ns_base_addr + EXYNOS_BOOT_ADDR);
>> -
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CACHE_L2X0
>> + l2x0_regs_phys = virt_to_phys(&l2x0_saved_regs);
>> +#endif
>
> NAK. Please look at how arch/arm/mm/l2c-l2x0-resume.S gets the address
> of this structure in assembly code. The name of this variable is crap
> in any case. It's not the registers, it's the saved registers. So even
> more reason to kill this abomination, which incidentally, I've already
> killed off once before in the exynos code.
>

Right. The way l2c-l2x0-resume.S does this is much better. Somehow I
overlooked it when implementing this.

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/