Re: [PATCHv5] mtd: nand: atmel_nand: retrieve NFC clock

[Ezequiel Garcia]

On 13 September 2014 00:23, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Retrieve the NFC clock to make sure it is enabled. Make that optional to ensure
> compatibility with previous device trees but document it as mandatory so newer
> device trees will include it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v5:
>  - Added a proper commit log
>
>  .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt         |  2 ++
>  drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c                      | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> index c4728839d0c1..6edc3b616e98 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ Optional properties:
>      - reg : should specify the address and size used for NFC command registers,
>              NFC registers and NFC Sram. NFC Sram address and size can be absent
>              if don't want to use it.
> +    - clocks: phandle to the peripheral clock
>    - Optional properties:
>      - atmel,write-by-sram: boolean to enable NFC write by sram.
>
> @@ -98,6 +99,7 @@ nand0: nand@40000000 {
>                 compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-nfc";
>                 #address-cells = <1>;
>                 #size-cells = <1>;
> +               clocks = <&hsmc_clk>
>                 reg = <
>                         0x70000000 0x10000000   /* NFC Command Registers */
>                         0xffffc000 0x00000070   /* NFC HSMC regs */
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> index 9c5f717bda54..d1e502f8dbd0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>   *
>   */
>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -96,6 +97,8 @@ struct atmel_nfc {
>         bool                    use_nfc_sram;
>         bool                    write_by_sram;
>
> +       struct clk              *clk;
> +
>         bool                    is_initialized;
>         struct completion       comp_ready;
>         struct completion       comp_cmd_done;
> @@ -2248,6 +2251,7 @@ static int atmel_nand_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>         struct atmel_nfc *nfc = &nand_nfc;
>         struct resource *nfc_cmd_regs, *nfc_hsmc_regs, *nfc_sram;
> +       int ret;
>
>         nfc_cmd_regs = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>         nfc->base_cmd_regs = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, nfc_cmd_regs);
> @@ -2279,8 +2283,28 @@ static int atmel_nand_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         nfc_writel(nfc->hsmc_regs, IDR, 0xffffffff);
>         nfc_readl(nfc->hsmc_regs, SR);  /* clear the NFC_SR */
>
> +       nfc->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> +       if (!IS_ERR(nfc->clk)) {
> +               ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->clk);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       return ret;
> +       } else {
> +               dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "NFC clock missing, update your Device Tree");

Looks much better now thanks. If the clock is not really optional, you
can consider this a firmware bug. We've used FW_BUG messages for these
cases
(see vim drivers/watchdog/orion_wdt.c), so you could write something like:

dev_warn(..., FW_BUG "devicetree clock missing");

Just a suggestion.
-- 
Ezequiel GarcÃa, VanguardiaSur
www.vanguardiasur.com.ar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/