Re: futex_wait_setup sleeping while atomic bug.

[Darren Hart]

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 04:53:38PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 23:52 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 23:44:35 +0200
> > Subject: futex: Unlock hb->lock in futex_wait_requeue_pi() error path
> 
> That's the second time we are bitten by bugs in when requeing, now pi.
> We need to reconsider some of our testing tools to stress these paths
> better, imo.

We do, yes. Per the kselftest discussion at kernel summit, I agreed to move the
futextest testsuite into the kernel, function into kselftest and performance
into perf, then futextest can go away. From there we can look at how to improve
these tests.

Sadly, the best testing we seem to have is trinity - which does a fantastic job
at finding nasties.

If someone wanted to start having a look at migrating the futextest tests
over... I certainly wouldn't object to the help! ;-)

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dvhart/futextest.git

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/