Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86, mm: Add set_memory_wt() for WT

From: Toshi Kani
Date: Mon Sep 08 2014 - 14:52:39 EST


On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 10:23 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2014 8:18 AM, "Toshi Kani" <toshi.kani@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 09:49 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Yigal Korman <yigal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > I think that what confused Andy (or at least me) is the documentation in Documentation/x86/pat.txt
> > > > If it's possible, can you please update pat.txt as part of the patch?
> > >
> > > Indeed. That file seems to indicate several times that the intended
> > > use of set_memory_xyz is for RAM.
> >
> >
> > Good point. pat.txt is correct that the "intended" use of
> > set_memory_xyz() is for RAM since there is no other way to set non-WB
> > attribute for RAM. For reserved memory, one should call ioremap_xyz()
> > to map with the xyz attribute directly. From the functionality POV,
> > set_memory_xyz() works for reserved memory, but such usage is not
> > intended.
> >
> > Should I drop the patch 4/5 until we can track the use of WT for RAM?
>
> Probably not. I can imagine someone ioremapping a huge chunk of
> NV-DIMM and then wanting to change some of it to WT. Unless I've
> missed something (which is rather likely), the cleanest way to do this
> is with set_memory_wt.

Yeah, that sounds possible.

> If that happens, someone should update pat.txt to indicate that it's allowed.

Since it is unlikely that someone will update pat.txt later, I will
update it to:

-------------------------------------------------------------------
API | RAM | ACPI,... | Reserved/Holes |

-----------------------|----------|------------|------------------|
set_memory_wt | *1 | -- | WT |
set_memory_wb | | | |


*1: -EINVAL due to the current limitation in reserve_memtype().


Thanks,
-Toshi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/