Re: bit fields && data tearing

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 01:34:52PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 09/05/2014 01:14 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > > 
> > > Here's how I read the two statements.
> > > 
> > > First, the commit message:
> > > 
> > > "It [this commit] documents that CPUs [supported by the Linux kernel]
> > > _must provide_ atomic one-byte and two-byte naturally aligned loads and stores."
> > > 
> > > Second, in the body of the document:
> > > 
> > > "The Linux kernel no longer supports pre-EV56 Alpha CPUs, because these
> > > older CPUs _do not provide_ atomic one-byte and two-byte loads and stores."
> > > 
> > 
> > Does this apply in general or only to SMP configurations?  I guess
> > non-SMP configurations would still have problems if interrupted in the
> > wrong place...
> 
> And preemption could cause problems, too.  So I believe that it needs
> to be universal.

Well preemption is usually caused by an interrupt, except you have a
combined load and preempt instruction :)

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html