Re: regression caused by cgroups optimization in 3.17-rc2

[Dave Hansen]

On 09/02/2014 06:33 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> kfree isn't eating 56% of "all cpu time" here, and it wasn't clear to
> me whether Dave filtered symbols from only memcontrol.o, memory.o, and
> mmap.o in a similar way.  I'm not arguing against the regression, I'm
> just trying to make sense of the numbers from the *patched* kernel.

I guess I could have included it in the description, but that was a
pretty vanilla run:

	perf top --call-graph=fp --stdio > foo.txt

I didn't use any filtering.  I didn't even know I _could_ filter. :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/