Re: [PATCH 5/8] of: Add Tegra124 EMC bindings

[Stephen Warren]

On 07/31/2014 05:05 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> On 31/07/14 13:48, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> > > I see that the TRM implies the whole 4-bit field is RAM code, rather
> > > than there being 2 separate 2-bit fields for RAM code and boot device
> > > code. Can you please file a bug against the TRM to document this
> > > correctly? (The details of which bits are which are visible on the
> > > Jetson TK1 schematics for example).
> >
> > Yes, I'll file a bug.
>
> On a closer look, the downstream kernel has been recently updated to
> consider the whole 4 bits the ram code. The relevant bug also has a
> comment mentioning that starting from T124, the whole 4 bits is
> considered the RAM code.

That's odd. Given the structure of the BCT hasn't change, I suspect 
that's a documentation bug that's propagated elsewhere. Can you send me 
the bug number internally, and I'll take a look? Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/