Re: vmstat: On demand vmstat workers V8

[Andrew Morton]

On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:55:17 -0500 (CDT) Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, Sasha Levin wrote:
> 
> > This patch doesn't interact well with my fuzzing setup. I'm seeing
> > the following:
> >
> > [  490.446927] BUG: using __this_cpu_read() in preemptible [00000000] code: kworker/16:1/7368
> > [  490.447909] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
> 
> __this_cpu_read() from vmstat_update is only called from a kworker that
> is bound to a single cpu. A false positive?

schedule_delayed_work() uses system_wq.  The comment in workqueue.h says

 * system_wq is the one used by schedule[_delayed]_work[_on]().
 * Multi-CPU multi-threaded.  There are users which expect relatively
 * short queue flush time.  Don't queue works which can run for too
 * long.

but the code itself does

	system_wq = alloc_workqueue("events", 0, 0);

ie: it didn't pass WQ_UNBOUND in the flags.


Tejun, wazzup?



Also, Sasha's report showed this:

[  490.464613] kernel BUG at mm/vmstat.c:1278!

That's your VM_BUG_ON() in vmstat_update().  That ain't no false
positive!



Is this code expecting that schedule_delayed_work() will schedule the
work on the current CPU?  I don't think it will do that.  Maybe you
should be looking at schedule_delayed_work_on().

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/