Re: [PATCH] m68k/q40: Revert "m68k/q40: Fix q40_irq_startup() to return -ENXIO on failures"

[Nick Krause]

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/23/2014 05:51 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>
>> Revert since we're trying to return -ENXIO from a function returning
>> unsigned int. Not only it causes compiler warnings it's also obviously
>> incorrect.
>>
>> In general, watch for patches from Nick Krause since they are not even
>> build tested.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Guess I wasn't fast enough with my comments :-(
>
> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>> ---
>>   arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c b/arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c
>> index 9dfa1ea..513f9bb 100644
>> --- a/arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c
>> +++ b/arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c
>> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static unsigned int q40_irq_startup(struct irq_data
>> *data)
>>         case 1: case 2: case 8: case 9:
>>         case 11: case 12: case 13:
>>                 printk("%s: ISA IRQ %d not implemented by HW\n", __func__,
>> irq);
>> -               return -ENXIO;
>> +               /* FIXME return -ENXIO; */
>>         }
>>         return 0;
>>   }
>>
>


I guess this is another bad patch :(.
Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/