Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] futex: introduce an optimistic spinning futex

[Mike Galbraith]

On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 21:34 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> I was telling Robert that if futexes get optimistic spinning, he should
> reconsider their use of userspace spinlocks in favor of this, because
> I'm pretty sure that they will see a great improvement.

My (dated) experience with pgsql says you're likely right.

Once upon a time, preempting a userspace spinlock owner caused pgsql to
collapse into a quivering heap.  The scheduler trying to hand the CPU
back to a preempted task instead of selecting what was strictly speaking
the most deserving task afterward (LAST_BUDDY) let pgsql+oltp scale nice
and flat instead of self destructing, but the root cause of collapse was
spinners lacking knowledge.   With spin done in kernel, you can know
when spinning is a waste of perfectly good cycles.

-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/